Subscribe for daily wellness inspiration

Like onlymyhealth on Facebook!

Difference between Allopathy and Osteopathy

By  ,  Onlymyhealth editorial team
Sep 27, 2011
4.8 / 5(4 Ratings)

Difference between Allopathy and OsteopathyWhat is Allopathy?


Allopathy is a term used for representing the most popular and effective treatment procedure practiced in the world today. The word “allopathy” is derived from the two words allo and pathos. Whereas the former means “opposite”, the later means “suffering”. Allopathic treatment basically resides on the usage of medicines for treating illnesses and alleviating associated symptoms.

 

What is Osteopathy?


Alternative treatment options such as osteopathy are different from allopathy. Osteopathy is a medicine free, non invasive treatment procedure which aims towards holistic health. The mode of treatment is to strengthen the musculoskeletal frame of the body for addressing diverse health issues.

 

Establishing Difference between Allopathy and Osteopathy

 

The difference between allopathy and osteopathy can be categorically explained with the help of the following points:

 

  1. The very basic difference between allopathy and osteopathy lies in the fact that allopathy relies on medicinal preparations whereas osteopathy resides on “hands on” treatments. Some of the most common treatment options include manipulation and mobilization of joints, tissue stretching and tactile pressure.
  2. Essentially, osteopathy is a non-invasive procedure. Allopathic treatments might resort to surgical processes in case required.
  3. Whereas osteopathy primarily addresses the musculoskeletal system for curing health problems, allopathy would be addressing the specific organ where the problem lies. There are medicines directed to the organ and its problems.
  4. Allopathy is primarily targeted towards localized healing whereas osteopathy is targeted towards holistic healing systems for complete health.
  5. Another difference between allopathy and osteopathyis that whereas osteopathy complements allopathy, the reverse is not true. Most often, allopathic doctors would consider osteopathic and chiropractic procedures for treating chronic aches and pains like osteoarthritis. However, osteopaths would never consider allopathy as a complementary form of treatment.
  6. Osteopathy is a treatment free from side effects. The treatment is essentially natural in nature and there are no latent repercussions to worry about. In case of allopathy however, medicines might have certain side effects, some of which might be difficult to deal with.

 

The basic difference between allopathy and osteopathy lies in its core philosophy. Whereas one relies solely on medicinal formulations the other chooses to use specific humanized techniques for effective treatments. Therefore, for osteopathy, the quality of therapist you hire would be crucial to the treatment process. Since he would be the person administering the treatments, you would have to consider engaging an experienced professional for the purpose.

 

Read more articles on Osteopathy

 

 

Related Articles
    4.8 / 5(4 Ratings)
    Write a Review
    Post a Comment
    Disclaimer +
    Though all possible measures have been taken to ensure accuracy, reliability, timeliness and authenticity of the information; Onlymyhealth assumes no liability for the same. Using any information of this website is at the viewers’ risk. Please be informed that we are not responsible for advice/tips given by any third party in form of comments on article pages . If you have or suspect having any medical condition, kindly contact your professional health care provider.